Mind the premium gap

Insurance and Reinsurance — By on November 28, 2012 at 12:40 AM

The world has been battered by natural catastrophes in recent years, revealing a serious gap between the economic cost of natural catastrophes and the levels of insured risk.

Recently published research for Lloyd’s reveals a $168bn annual shortfall between levels of insurance and actual economic losses caused by  natural disasters across the world. Seventeen of the 42 countries analysed are significantly at risk.   Lloyd’s is urging governments, insurers and businesses to do more to close this  gap.

Lloyd’s Global underinsurance report 2012   Commissioned by Lloyd’s, the Centre for Economic and Business Research analysed data from 42 countries to find out the difference between the minimum levels of insurance cover needed and those actually in place.   Last year alone,   earthquakes, floods, storms, tsunamis and other natural disasters led to insurance payouts of over  $116bn. Yet while 2011 proved  the second costliest  year on record for the industry, insurance covered less than a third  of the $370bn economic loss.

In Japan, for example, only $35bn of the estimated $210bn of total  damage wrought by  the earthquake and tsunami was insured.

“Worldwide, the insurance shortfall for 2011 was estimated to be more than $250bn, ” says Dr Kurt Karl, Swiss Re Chief Economist. “It also showed that both developing and advanced economies can be underinsured.   The earthquake in Japan, the most costly natural catastrophe of all time, revealed that earthquake insurance penetration is low in Japan, despite being highly exposed to this risk.”   In a difficult economic climate, these levels of  financial exposure have a clear impact on economic recovery.   “

After the devastating earthquakes in Japan and New Zealand, and severe flooding in Thailand and Australia, the impact of natural catastrophes is clear, ” says Lloyd’s Chief Executive Richard Ward. “Economies across the world urgently need to address their disaster preparedness if they’re to cope with the fallout of events that are becoming both more frequent and more costly.”

Emerging Market Exposures   Lloyd’s research shows  those countries most at risk combine the high likelihood of natural catastrophes with low levels of insurance penetration. Inevitably, it is these countries’  taxpayers who  currently pick up the large proportion of disaster losses.

“In the absence of insurance coverage, the cost of reconstruction falls on the shoulders of governments, non-governmental organisations, charities and, frequently, the affected  households and companies, ” says Karl.

Many, but not all, of these more exposed countries are in emerging markets. Although they are developing rapidly, with growing assets at risk, the level of insurance penetration, nevertheless remains low – as do other sources of post-disaster relief.   “The gap between economic and insured losses can be severe in low- to middle-income countries, where the magnitude of the losses arising from a catastrophe may outstrip the government’s ability to act as insurer of last resort, ” says Karl.   As the world looks to the new high growth economies to become the financial powerhouses of the future, Lloyd’s Global Underinsurance Report provides a timely wake-up call to governments, businesses and the insurance industry alike.

(source: Lloyd’s of London website)

Leave a Reply

IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

What is 10 + 10 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:

Trackbacks

Leave a Trackback