Clyde & Co Update – Effect of non-payment of hire: After The Astra comes another twist in the tale

Associations, Chartering, Containers, Fixtures, Legal, Markets — By on April 1, 2015 at 1:20 PM

Marine-ClydeCo-0707_800_450_90_s_c1_c_cEffect of non-payment of hire: After The Astra comes another twist in the  tale

April 1, 2015 | Written by Nick Austin and Chris Moxon

On 18 April 2013, Flaux J handed down a judgment in Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc. (The Astra) that surprised many in the shipping community with its analysis that a charterers’ failure to pay hire amounted to a breach of a condition, thereby entitling an owner not only to cancel the charter and escape future performance but also to claim damages for the unperformed part.

The recent judgment of Popplewell J in Spar Shipping AS v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Co., Ltd, handed down on 18 March 2015, challenges that conclusion in a thorough and significant review of this important area of law.


Clearly a refusal or failure to pay hire according to the terms of the charter, or a late payment, amounts to a breach of contract. The difficulty comes in determining whether that breach gives rise to a right to terminate the contract and claim damages. Although in most cases the charterparty will contain provisions that grant the owner a contractual right to withdraw the vessel in the event of non-payment, this will generally only provide the owner with the right to claim hire that is payable and earned up to that point.

To read the full update, please download the pdf from the link below.

Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

What is 6 + 9 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:


Leave a Trackback